VICTORY AT THE BALLOT BOX!

The  “FREEZE PILGRIM”  Referendum WINS BIG

Plymouth and TEN other towns voted against Pilgrim license:
Duxbury, Scituate, Kingston, Marshfield, Provincetown, Truro, Brewster, Dennis, Harwich, and Mashpee.

Plymouth Town Manager sends following message to NRC:


The People of Plymouth, Massachusetts call upon the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to immediately suspend all further action on the application of the Entergy Corporation for renewal of its license to operate the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station pending the full implementation of all safety improvements recommended by the NRC as a result of lessons learned from the failures of similarly designed reactors in Fukushima, Japan.  
   



HERE’S WHY:


Failed Design: 
Pilgrim, like the reactors at Fukushima, is a GE Mark I Boiling Water Reactor – a failed design. The NRC years ago recognized that “Mark-I failure within the first few hours following core melt would appear rather likely;" - a 90% likelihood of containment failure.

Failed Upgrades:
The events at Fukushima last year demonstrated that the “fix” implemented in the 90’s, the Direct Torus Vent, designed to relieve pressure during an accident, will also fail! Pilgrim’s vent, like Fukushima’s, is neither passively operable (without electricity or human intervention) nor filtered. Both are necessary now to reduce the risk of explosion and containment failure!

CLICK HERE to LEARN ABOUT FUKUSHIMA FIXES



Spent Fuel Storage: 
Pilgrim stores all its "spent fuel" in a pool located on the top floor of the reactor, outside the primary containment, with only a thin roof overhead. It was designed to hold 880 fuel assemblies, but now holds over 3,270. Experts for the Massachusetts Attorney General testified that the pool is vulnerable to a catastrophic fire from loss of water that could cause $488 billion dollars of damage and 24,000 cancers. Spent fuel stored in pools poses greater safety and security hazards than if stored in dry casks. (Dry casks at Fukushima did not fail!)

NRC CHAIRMAN SAYS “NO” TO PILGRIM:
The Chairman of the NRC, Gregory Jaczko, in his last dissenting opinion before being pressured out of office by our “industry-captured” congress, voted NOT to relicense Pilgrim without addressing Fukushima fixes, noting that Entergy need not suffer economically while these fixes are being addressed, as Pilgrim may continue to operate on its existing license during any delay.

This issue is now in the hands of the Federal Judiciary:

Attorney General Coakley Appeals to Federal Court:
http://www.mass.gov/ago/news-and-updates/press-releases/2012/2012-04-05-pilgrim-nuclear-appeal.html


Please donate to help us defray the costs of this initiative.